0xbt

She even further maintains that the mistake in admitting the affidavit was hazardous and must final result in the reversal of her conviction for holding a area of prostitution. Consequently, Smoot's conviction for trying to keep a home of prostitution need to be reversed. Smoot was arrested and charged with keeping the residence as a spot of prostitution. The other occupants pled responsible to the marijuana cost, though Smoot chose to proceed with trial on equally the marijuana demand and the holding a place of prostitution charge. According to Smoot, the document was inadmissible rumour, the State had no justifiable foundation for introducing the doc to explain the officers' good reasons for the investigation, and its admission was remarkably prejudicial in her prosecution for retaining a put of prostitution. 579(2), 501 S.E.2nd 806. If the State was involved that the jury could be puzzled about why the officers have been conducting surveillance of Smoot's residence, it could have merely experienced the officers testify that they made a decision to initiate the surveillance since that was the direction their investigation to date had led them.