0xbt

I draw from VSD and ViD’s literature about defining and locating values in relation to expertise, as I describe under. Friedman and P. H. Kahn (2003) describe three positions for locating values in relation to technologies. The tender embodied position acknowledges that technologies "do not literally embody an intention or value", that designers themselves are shaped by exterior forces, and that many technologies are not broadly adopted (2003, p 1179). Nevertheless it nonetheless argues that these technologies that do take hold can ensure sure sorts of behaviour. Rather than denying both the endogenous or exogenous view, the interactional view acknowledges "interpretive flexibility throughout technology design and use" (Shilton, Koepfler, and Fleischmann 2013, p. Shilton, Koepfler, and Fleischmann (2013) affirm that values and design literature usually makes use of definitions of values from anthropology, sociology, and social psychology. This occurs when related social teams are happy that any of their perceived problems about the expertise are resolved (Pinch and Bijker 1987). Thus, it may possibly appear that values change into ‘baked in’ to technologies because the expertise stabilizes. However, Humphreys (2005) observes that the stabilization that happens during a technology’s maturation is temporary, and so prospects for interpretive flexibility can resurface when the context surrounding a technology adjustments.